Cuba vs El Salvador: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Cuba
0.3582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.3356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
36th
El Salvador rank
38th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Cuba
  • El Salvador
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.3582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 36th and El Salvador ranks 38th of 146 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6983 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.9817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.9987 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5359 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4628 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.7248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.6931 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3438 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.5999 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2702 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1852 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Cuba or El Salvador?
Cuba, at 0.3582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.3356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Cuba and El Salvador?
0.0226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and El Salvador rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Cuba ranks 36th and El Salvador ranks 38th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs El Salvador: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/el-salvador/">Cuba vs El Salvador: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.