Colombia vs Nepal: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Colombia
0.0548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
0.0655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
89th
Nepal rank
86th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Colombia
  • Nepal
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 89th and Nepal ranks 86th of 146 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2368 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 0.1216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2699 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 0.0984 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2302 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.0815 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1528 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0713 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 0.0744 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1214 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 0.0645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 0.0565 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Colombia or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.0655 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Colombia and Nepal?
0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Nepal rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Colombia ranks 89th and Nepal ranks 86th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Nepal: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/colombia/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/colombia/nepal/">Colombia vs Nepal: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.