China vs Zimbabwe: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

China
0.9118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
15th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • China
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.2482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times China's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

China ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5932 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.3755 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1144 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.7156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0664 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1990s 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.9935 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.643 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3505 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2010s 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 0.8754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China and Zimbabwe?
0.2482 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Zimbabwe rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zimbabwe: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/zimbabwe/">China vs Zimbabwe: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.