China vs Myanmar: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

China
0.9118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
0.7272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
18th
Myanmar rank
21st

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • China
  • Myanmar
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.9118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 0.1846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 18th and Myanmar ranks 21st of 146 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1970s 0.3755 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1415 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1980s 0.7156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2773 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4383 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1990s 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2327 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7811 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2000s 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2942 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2010s 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6505 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 0.8754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6879 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1875 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China or Myanmar?
China, at 0.9118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China and Myanmar?
0.1846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Myanmar rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China ranks 18th and Myanmar ranks 21st of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Myanmar: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/myanmar/">China vs Myanmar: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.