Chad vs Puerto Rico: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Chad
0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
143rd
Puerto Rico rank
145th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Chad
  • Puerto Rico
01234196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.4 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 46 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Chad ranks 143rd and Puerto Rico ranks 145th of 146 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5661 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Chad or Puerto Rico?
Chad, at 0.0003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Chad and Puerto Rico?
0.0001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Puerto Rico?
46 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Chad and Puerto Rico rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Chad ranks 143rd and Puerto Rico ranks 145th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Puerto Rico: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chad/puerto-rico-us/">Chad vs Puerto Rico: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.