Canada vs Congo: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Canada
0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
119th
Congo rank
120th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Canada
  • Congo
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 119th and Congo ranks 120th of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 6 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0176 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.0211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0077 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0064 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0118 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Canada or Congo?
Canada, at 0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Canada and Congo?
0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Congo rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Canada ranks 119th and Congo ranks 120th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Congo: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/canada/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/canada/congo-rep/">Canada vs Congo: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.