Brazil vs Mozambique: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Brazil
0.2439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.2377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
46th
Mozambique rank
47th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Brazil
  • Mozambique
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.2439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 46th and Mozambique ranks 47th of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0831 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.1491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.1693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1642 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.2606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0988 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.2721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0304 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 0.2441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2591 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Brazil or Mozambique?
Brazil, at 0.2439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Brazil and Mozambique?
0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Mozambique rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Brazil ranks 46th and Mozambique ranks 47th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Mozambique: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/mozambique/">Brazil vs Mozambique: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.