Brazil vs Italy: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Brazil
0.2439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy
0.2237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
46th
Italy rank
49th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Brazil
  • Italy
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.2439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 0.0202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.

Brazil ranks 46th and Italy ranks 49th of 146 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Italy Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7465 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6323 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1970s 0.1491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9286 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1980s 0.1693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1990s 0.187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
2000s 0.2606 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9952 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7347 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
2010s 0.2721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5173 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
2020s 0.2441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Brazil or Italy?
Brazil, at 0.2439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Italy as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Brazil and Italy?
0.0202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Italy?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Italy rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Brazil ranks 46th and Italy ranks 49th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Italy: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/italy/">Brazil vs Italy: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.