Bhutan vs Mauritius: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Bhutan
0.017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
114th
Mauritius rank
112th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Mauritius
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 114th and Mauritius ranks 112th of 146 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.923 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9577 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0149 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4568 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.442 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2964 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Bhutan or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.0185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Bhutan and Mauritius?
0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Mauritius rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Bhutan ranks 114th and Mauritius ranks 112th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Mauritius: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/mauritius/">Bhutan vs Mauritius: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.