Austria vs Canada: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Austria
0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
116th
Canada rank
119th

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Austria
  • Canada
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 116th and Canada ranks 119th of 146 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0339 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1970s 0.0335 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1980s 0.0419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0177 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
1990s 0.048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0211 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2000s 0.0502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2010s 0.0619 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0519 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria
2020s 0.0414 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Austria or Canada?
Austria, at 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Austria and Canada?
0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Austria and Canada rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Austria ranks 116th and Canada ranks 119th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Canada: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/austria/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/austria/canada/">Austria vs Canada: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.