Argentina vs Poland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Argentina
0.1308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
0.1349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
65th
Poland rank
63rd

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Argentina
  • Poland
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.1349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Argentina ranks 65th and Poland ranks 63rd of 146 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1970s 0.3071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7565 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1980s 0.2754 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1990s 0.222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3773 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 0.205 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2425 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0376 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 0.1679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2509 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 0.1422 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Argentina or Poland?
Poland, at 0.1349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Argentina and Poland?
0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Poland rank globally for non food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Argentina ranks 65th and Poland ranks 63rd of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Poland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/argentina/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/non-food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/argentina/poland/">Argentina vs Poland: Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 7,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Non Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.