Kiribati vs Singapore: Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP
Kiribati
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Singapore
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Kiribati rank
187th
Singapore rank
186th
Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP over time
- Kiribati
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Kiribati, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Kiribati ranks 187th and Singapore ranks 186th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp, Kiribati or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp between Kiribati and Singapore?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Singapore?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Singapore rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp?
- Kiribati ranks 187th and Singapore ranks 186th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.