Eritrea vs Kazakhstan: Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Kazakhstan
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eritrea rank
125th
Kazakhstan rank
126th
Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Eritrea ranks 125th and Kazakhstan ranks 126th of 193 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Kazakhstan?
- Eritrea, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Kazakhstan?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Kazakhstan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Kazakhstan rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 125th and Kazakhstan ranks 126th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.