Chad vs Estonia: Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP
Chad
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Estonia
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Chad rank
80th
Estonia rank
79th
Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP over time
- Chad
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Chad, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
Chad ranks 80th and Estonia ranks 79th of 193 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp, Chad or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp between Chad and Estonia?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Estonia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Estonia rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of gdp?
- Chad ranks 80th and Estonia ranks 79th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.