Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0452 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2021
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.05 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
152nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
150th

Nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0123196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.05 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0452 tonnes per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0048 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Bahamas ranks 152nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 150th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0325 tonnes per square kilometre 0.4286 tonnes per square kilometre 0.3961 tonnes per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.053 tonnes per square kilometre 0.7143 tonnes per square kilometre 0.6613 tonnes per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.03 tonnes per square kilometre 1.7 tonnes per square kilometre 1.67 tonnes per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0133 tonnes per square kilometre 2.64 tonnes per square kilometre 2.63 tonnes per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.025 tonnes per square kilometre 3.08 tonnes per square kilometre 3.05 tonnes per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0991 tonnes per square kilometre 0.063 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0361 tonnes per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0452 tonnes per square kilometre 0.05 tonnes per square kilometre 0.0048 tonnes per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.05 tonnes per square kilometre against 0.0452 tonnes per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0048 tonnes per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
45 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2021.
How do Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 152nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 150th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/nitrogen-fertilizer-use-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/nitrogen-fertilizer-use-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nitrogen fertilizer use, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,961 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nitrogen fertilizer use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.