Sweden vs Tanzania: Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled
Sweden
184,000 tonnes
in 2023
Tanzania
188,183 tonnes
in 2023
Sweden rank
53rd
Tanzania rank
52nd
Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled over time
- Sweden
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 188,183 tonnes against 184,000 tonnes in Sweden, a difference of 4,183 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 53rd and Tanzania ranks 52nd of 202 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 156,688 tonnes | 3,064 tonnes | 153,624 tonnes | Sweden |
| 1970s | 247,835 tonnes | 13,255 tonnes | 234,580 tonnes | Sweden |
| 1980s | 242,460 tonnes | 24,155 tonnes | 218,305 tonnes | Sweden |
| 1990s | 204,660 tonnes | 24,357 tonnes | 180,303 tonnes | Sweden |
| 2000s | 174,324 tonnes | 32,861 tonnes | 141,463 tonnes | Sweden |
| 2010s | 177,046 tonnes | 89,263 tonnes | 87,783 tonnes | Sweden |
| 2020s | 194,768 tonnes | 153,516 tonnes | 41,252 tonnes | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled, Sweden or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 188,183 tonnes against 184,000 tonnes in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled between Sweden and Tanzania?
- 4,183 tonnes, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tanzania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Tanzania rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled?
- Sweden ranks 53rd and Tanzania ranks 52nd of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.