Cote d'Ivoire vs Latvia: Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled
Cote d'Ivoire
85,600 tonnes
in 2023
Latvia
80,316 tonnes
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
77th
Latvia rank
79th
Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Latvia
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 85,600 tonnes against 80,316 tonnes in Latvia, a difference of 5,284 tonnes.
That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 77th and Latvia ranks 79th of 202 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38,838 tonnes | 31,638 tonnes | 7,200 tonnes | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 25,261 tonnes | 39,540 tonnes | 14,278 tonnes | Latvia |
| 2010s | 37,381 tonnes | 71,516 tonnes | 34,135 tonnes | Latvia |
| 2020s | 56,566 tonnes | 82,903 tonnes | 26,337 tonnes | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled, Cote d'Ivoire or Latvia?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 85,600 tonnes against 80,316 tonnes in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled between Cote d'Ivoire and Latvia?
- 5,284 tonnes, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Latvia rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 77th and Latvia ranks 79th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.