Congo vs Montenegro: Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled
Congo
1,471 tonnes
in 2023
Montenegro
1,317 tonnes
in 2023
Congo rank
154th
Montenegro rank
155th
Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled over time
- Congo
- Montenegro
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1,471 tonnes against 1,317 tonnes in Montenegro, a difference of 154 tonnes.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Congo ranks 154th and Montenegro ranks 155th of 202 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 313.25 tonnes | 1,384 tonnes | 1,070 tonnes | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 461.4 tonnes | 1,291 tonnes | 830 tonnes | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 2,354 tonnes | 1,279 tonnes | 1,076 tonnes | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled, Congo or Montenegro?
- Congo, at 1,471 tonnes against 1,317 tonnes in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled between Congo and Montenegro?
- 154 tonnes, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Montenegro rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 154th and Montenegro ranks 155th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.