Chile vs Serbia: Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled
Chile
244,877 tonnes
in 2023
Serbia
232,221 tonnes
in 2023
Chile rank
42nd
Serbia rank
44th
Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 244,877 tonnes against 232,221 tonnes in Serbia, a difference of 12,656 tonnes.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Chile ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 44th of 202 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 226,719 tonnes | 281,722 tonnes | 55,002 tonnes | Serbia |
| 2010s | 259,120 tonnes | 225,982 tonnes | 33,138 tonnes | Chile |
| 2020s | 241,148 tonnes | 211,647 tonnes | 29,500 tonnes | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 244,877 tonnes against 232,221 tonnes in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled between Chile and Serbia?
- 12,656 tonnes, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled?
- Chile ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 44th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.