Barbados vs Sao Tome and Principe: Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled
Barbados
141 tonnes
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
133 tonnes
in 2023
Barbados rank
174th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
176th
Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 141 tonnes against 133 tonnes in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 8 tonnes.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 174th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 176th of 202 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,190 tonnes | 50.12 tonnes | 1,140 tonnes | Barbados |
| 2010s | 590.2 tonnes | 84 tonnes | 506.2 tonnes | Barbados |
| 2020s | 152 tonnes | 123.75 tonnes | 28.25 tonnes | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled, Barbados or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Barbados, at 141 tonnes against 133 tonnes in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled between Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 8 tonnes, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 174th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 176th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.