Aruba vs Kiribati: Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled
Aruba
0 tonnes
in 2023
Kiribati
0 tonnes
in 2023
Aruba rank
195th
Kiribati rank
195th
Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Kiribati
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Kiribati, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kiribati ahead.
Aruba ranks 195th and Kiribati ranks 195th of 202 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.25 tonnes | 11.25 tonnes | 11 tonnes | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 18 tonnes | 6.4 tonnes | 11.6 tonnes | Aruba |
| 2020s | 2.75 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 2.75 tonnes | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled, Aruba or Kiribati?
- Aruba, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled between Aruba and Kiribati?
- 0 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Kiribati?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Kiribati rank globally for nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 195th and Kiribati ranks 195th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nitrogen fertilizer use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nitrogen fertilizer use with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.