Sweden vs United Republic of Tanzania: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Sweden
0 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
19.82 t
in 2023
Sweden rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time
- Sweden
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 19.82 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 19.82 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | -0.3437 t | 0.3437 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 t | 4.71 t | 4.71 t | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Sweden or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 19.82 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 19.82 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
- Sweden ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.