South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
South Africa
-349.23 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-2.34 t
in 2023
South Africa rank
141st
Zimbabwe rank
139th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time
- South Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -2.34 t against -349.23 t in South Africa, a difference of 346.89 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
South Africa ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 139th of 142 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 23.91 t | 23.91 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | -37.31 t | -0.585 t | 36.72 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -2.34 t against -349.23 t in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 346.89 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
- South Africa ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 139th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.