Polynesia vs Sweden: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Polynesia
0 t
in 2023
Sweden
0 t
in 2023
Polynesia rank
12th
Sweden rank
12th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time
- Polynesia
- Sweden
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Polynesia ranks 12th and Sweden ranks 12th of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.0443 t | 35.71 t | 35.76 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0075 t | 0 t | 0.0075 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Polynesia or Sweden?
- Polynesia, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Polynesia and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Sweden?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Sweden rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
- Polynesia ranks 12th and Sweden ranks 12th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.