Namibia vs Rwanda: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation

Namibia
0 t
in 2023
Rwanda
0 t
in 2023
Namibia rank
12th
Rwanda rank
12th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time

  • Namibia
  • Rwanda
-1-0.75-0.5-0.250201420182023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Rwanda ahead.

Namibia ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 157 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t -0.255 t 0.255 t Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Namibia or Rwanda?
Namibia, at 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Namibia and Rwanda?
0 t, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
Namibia ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
188 places, 1,964 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.