Iceland vs Namibia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2023
Iceland rank
12th
Namibia rank
12th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time
- Iceland
- Namibia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 12th of 157 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | -0.005 t | 0 t | 0.005 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Iceland or Namibia?
- Iceland, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Iceland and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
- Iceland ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 12th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.