Finland vs Polynesia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Finland
0 t
in 2023
Polynesia
0 t
in 2023
Finland rank
12th
Polynesia rank
12th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time
- Finland
- Polynesia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Polynesia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Polynesia ranks 12th of 157 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.7667 t | -0.0517 t | 0.715 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0.0075 t | 0.0075 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Finland or Polynesia?
- Finland, at 0 t against 0 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Finland and Polynesia?
- 0 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Polynesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Polynesia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
- Finland ranks 12th and Polynesia ranks 12th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.