Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Natural rubber in primary forms β Stock Variation
Eswatini
-0.02 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-2.34 t
in 2023
Eswatini rank
138th
Zimbabwe rank
139th
Natural rubber in primary forms β Stock Variation over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -0.02 t against -2.34 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.32 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Eswatini ranks 138th and Zimbabwe ranks 139th of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.0217 t | 23.91 t | 23.93 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.815 t | -0.585 t | 1.4 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms β stock variation, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Eswatini, at -0.02 t against -2.34 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms β stock variation between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 2.32 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms β stock variation?
- Eswatini ranks 138th and Zimbabwe ranks 139th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms β Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.