Eswatini vs South Africa: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Eswatini
-0.02 t
in 2023
South Africa
-349.23 t
in 2023
Eswatini rank
138th
South Africa rank
141st
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time
- Eswatini
- South Africa
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -0.02 t against -349.23 t in South Africa, a difference of 349.21 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Eswatini ranks 138th and South Africa ranks 141st of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.0217 t | 0 t | 0.0217 t | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.815 t | -37.31 t | 38.12 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Eswatini or South Africa?
- Eswatini, at -0.02 t against -349.23 t in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Eswatini and South Africa?
- 349.21 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and South Africa rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
- Eswatini ranks 138th and South Africa ranks 141st of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.