Congo vs Estonia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation

Congo
0 t
in 2023
Estonia
0 t
in 2023
Congo rank
12th
Estonia rank
12th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time

  • Congo
  • Estonia
-0.2-0.15-0.1-0.05-0201420182023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Estonia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Estonia ahead.

Congo ranks 12th and Estonia ranks 12th of 157 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Estonia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t -0.0333 t 0.0333 t Congo
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Congo or Estonia?
Congo, at 0 t against 0 t in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Congo and Estonia?
0 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
Congo ranks 12th and Estonia ranks 12th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
188 places, 1,964 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.