China vs Lithuania: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation

China
0 t
in 2023
Lithuania
0 t
in 2023
China rank
12th
Lithuania rank
12th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time

  • China
  • Lithuania
-20020201020162023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Lithuania, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lithuania ahead.

China ranks 12th and Lithuania ranks 12th of 157 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, China or Lithuania?
China, at 0 t against 0 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between China and Lithuania?
0 t, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lithuania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do China and Lithuania rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
China ranks 12th and Lithuania ranks 12th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
188 places, 1,964 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.