China vs Eastern Africa: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
China
0 t
in 2023
Eastern Africa
17.48 t
in 2023
China rank
8th
Eastern Africa rank
10th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time
- China
- Eastern Africa
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 17.48 t against 0 t in China, a difference of 17.48 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was China ahead.
China ranks 8th and Eastern Africa ranks 10th of 142 countries.
Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Eastern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 71.24 t | 71.24 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 0 t | 327.95 t | 327.95 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, China or Eastern Africa?
- Eastern Africa, at 17.48 t against 0 t in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between China and Eastern Africa?
- 17.48 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eastern Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do China and Eastern Africa rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
- China ranks 8th and Eastern Africa ranks 10th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.