Australia vs Libya: Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation

Australia
0 t
in 2023
Libya
0 t
in 2023
Australia rank
12th
Libya rank
12th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time

  • Australia
  • Libya
00.10.20.30.40.5201020162023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Libya, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Libya ahead.

Australia ranks 12th and Libya ranks 12th of 157 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Libya Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1033 t 0 t 0.1033 t Australia
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Australia or Libya?
Australia, at 0 t against 0 t in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Australia and Libya?
0 t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Libya?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Australia and Libya rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
Australia ranks 12th and Libya ranks 12th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
188 places, 1,964 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.