Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation

Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
5,737 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
7th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-100.0k-50.0k050.0k201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 5,737 t against 0 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 5,737 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 142 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 0.062 t 8,589 t 8,589 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0 t -19,460 t 19,460 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 5,737 t against 0 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
5,737 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — stock variation?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-stock-variation/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-stock-variation/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
188 places, 1,964 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.