Rwanda vs Sweden: Natural rubber in primary forms β Residuals
Rwanda
0 t
in 2023
Sweden
0 t
in 2023
Rwanda rank
5th
Sweden rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms β Residuals over time
- Rwanda
- Sweden
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sweden ahead.
Rwanda ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 5th of 156 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | -5.83 t | 5.83 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 t | -14.5 t | 14.5 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms β residuals, Rwanda or Sweden?
- Rwanda, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms β residuals between Rwanda and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sweden?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Sweden rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms β residuals?
- Rwanda ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 5th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms β Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.