Polynesia vs Zimbabwe: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals

Polynesia
0 t
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 t
in 2023
Polynesia rank
5th
Zimbabwe rank
5th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time

  • Polynesia
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81201020162023

How they compare

Polynesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Polynesia ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 172 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Polynesia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Polynesia or Zimbabwe?
Polynesia, at 0 t against 0 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Polynesia and Zimbabwe?
0 t, with Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Polynesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
Polynesia ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 2,672 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.