Oceania vs Zambia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Oceania
0 t
in 2023
Zambia
0 t
in 2023
Oceania rank
8th
Zambia rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Oceania
- Zambia
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Zambia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 8th and Zambia ranks 5th of 28 groups.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1,081 t | -1.6 t | 1,079 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | -8 t | 0 t | 8 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Oceania or Zambia?
- Oceania, at 0 t against 0 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Oceania and Zambia?
- 0 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Zambia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Oceania ranks 8th and Zambia ranks 5th of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.