Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
3 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
0 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0201020162023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 3 t against 0 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 3 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 28 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s -6 t -15.2 t 9.2 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s -29,972 t -17.5 t 29,954 t United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 3 t against 0 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
3 t, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-residuals/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-residuals/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 2,672 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.