Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Rwanda: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
3 t
in 2023
Rwanda
0 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
2nd
Rwanda rank
5th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Rwanda
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0201020162023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 3 t against 0 t in Rwanda, a difference of 3 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Rwanda ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 5th of 10 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 20.17 t 0 t 20.17 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s -29,972 t 0 t 29,972 t Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Rwanda?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 3 t against 0 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Rwanda?
3 t, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Rwanda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Rwanda rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 5th of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Rwanda: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-residuals/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-residuals/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/rwanda/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Rwanda: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 2,672 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.