Mozambique vs Sweden: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Mozambique
2 t
in 2023
Sweden
0 t
in 2023
Mozambique rank
2nd
Sweden rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Mozambique
- Sweden
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 2 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 2 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Mozambique ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 5th of 156 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5 t | -3.5 t | 4 t | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 1.25 t | -14.5 t | 15.75 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Mozambique or Sweden?
- Mozambique, at 2 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Mozambique and Sweden?
- 2 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sweden?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Sweden rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Mozambique ranks 2nd and Sweden ranks 5th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.