Libya vs Mozambique: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Libya
0 t
in 2023
Mozambique
2 t
in 2023
Libya rank
5th
Mozambique rank
2nd
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Libya
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 2 t against 0 t in Libya, a difference of 2 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 5th and Mozambique ranks 2nd of 156 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0.5 t | 0.5 t | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1.25 t | 1.25 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Libya or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 2 t against 0 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Libya and Mozambique?
- 2 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mozambique?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Mozambique rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Libya ranks 5th and Mozambique ranks 2nd of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.