Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mozambique: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
4 t
in 2023
Mozambique
2 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
1st
Mozambique rank
2nd

Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Mozambique
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0201020162023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 4 t against 2 t in Mozambique, a difference of 2 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.0 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mozambique ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and Mozambique ranks 2nd of 10 groups.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Mozambique Difference Ahead
2010s -36.1 t 0.5 t 36.6 t Mozambique
2020s -29,954 t 1.25 t 29,955 t Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Mozambique?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 4 t against 2 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mozambique?
2 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mozambique?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mozambique rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and Mozambique ranks 2nd of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mozambique: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-residuals/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mozambique/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mozambique: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 2,672 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.