Finland vs Polynesia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Finland
0 t
in 2023
Polynesia
0 t
in 2023
Finland rank
5th
Polynesia rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Finland
- Polynesia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Polynesia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 5th and Polynesia ranks 5th of 172 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -8.8 t | 0 t | 8.8 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Finland or Polynesia?
- Finland, at 0 t against 0 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Finland and Polynesia?
- 0 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Polynesia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Polynesia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Finland ranks 5th and Polynesia ranks 5th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.