Eswatini vs Southern Africa: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Eswatini
0 t
in 2023
Southern Africa
0 t
in 2023
Eswatini rank
5th
Southern Africa rank
8th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Eswatini
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Southern Africa has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 5th and Southern Africa ranks 8th of 156 countries.
Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -3.3 t | -3 t | 0.3 t | Southern Africa |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Eswatini or Southern Africa?
- Eswatini, at 0 t against 0 t in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Eswatini and Southern Africa?
- 0 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Southern Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Southern Africa rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Eswatini ranks 5th and Southern Africa ranks 8th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.