Australia vs Rwanda: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Australia
0 t
in 2023
Rwanda
0 t
in 2023
Australia rank
5th
Rwanda rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Australia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 156 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -657 t | 0 t | 657 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Australia or Rwanda?
- Australia, at 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Australia and Rwanda?
- 0 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Australia ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.