Australia vs Namibia: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals

Australia
0 t
in 2023
Namibia
0 t
in 2023
Australia rank
5th
Namibia rank
5th

Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time

  • Australia
  • Namibia
-2.5k-2.0k-1.5k-1.0k-5000201020162023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 5th and Namibia ranks 5th of 172 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s -1,080 t 0 t 1,080 t Namibia
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Australia or Namibia?
Australia, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Australia and Namibia?
0 t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Namibia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and Namibia rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
Australia ranks 5th and Namibia ranks 5th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 2,672 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.