Australia vs Congo: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Australia
0 t
in 2023
Congo
0 t
in 2023
Australia rank
5th
Congo rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Congo, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 5th and Congo ranks 5th of 172 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1,080 t | 0 t | 1,080 t | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Australia or Congo?
- Australia, at 0 t against 0 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Australia and Congo?
- 0 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Australia ranks 5th and Congo ranks 5th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.