Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals

Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
3 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
2nd

Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
-80.0k-60.0k-40.0k-20.0k0201020162023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 3 t against 0 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 3 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 2nd of 156 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s -1,080 t -6 t 1,074 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 0 t -29,972 t 29,972 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Australia and New Zealand or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 3 t against 0 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
3 t, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 2nd of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-residuals/australia-and-new-zealand/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/natural-rubber-in-primary-forms-residuals/australia-and-new-zealand/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 2,672 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.