Australia and New Zealand vs Mozambique: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Mozambique
2 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
Mozambique rank
2nd
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 2 t against 0 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 2 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Mozambique ranks 2nd of 156 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1,080 t | 0.5 t | 1,081 t | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1.25 t | 1.25 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Australia and New Zealand or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 2 t against 0 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Australia and New Zealand and Mozambique?
- 2 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mozambique?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Mozambique rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Mozambique ranks 2nd of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.