Australia and New Zealand vs Finland: Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals
Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2023
Finland
0 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
Finland rank
5th
Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Finland
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Finland, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Finland ranks 5th of 156 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1,080 t | -8.8 t | 1,072 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher natural rubber in primary forms — residuals, Australia and New Zealand or Finland?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0 t against 0 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in natural rubber in primary forms — residuals between Australia and New Zealand and Finland?
- 0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Finland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Finland rank globally for natural rubber in primary forms — residuals?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Finland ranks 5th of 156 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Natural rubber in primary forms — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.